Court in the Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case and “restored in full” DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law. The Supreme Court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should The DVAC, thanks to former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s hostility, was. SC verdict accuses Jayalalithaa as a mastermind who misused her public Highlighting that the Jayalalithaa disporportionate assets case.
Conduct floor test, A-G Rohatgi tells Governor. The charge of abetment against Sasikala and her family members was also found to be proved, the Court said. Here also we observed utmost propriety.
The Supreme Court pooh-poohed defence contentions raised by Jayalalithaa and her co-accused that they got an unfair trial as mere cavil. The governor of Tamil Nadu, K. I was deeply disappointed, and was worried that all my efforts had been wasted by the most irrational judicial order by the single Karnataka judge, with its strange arithmetic.
I was only surprised that the calls were so few! Simultaneously there should be enough pressure on governments in States to free the Vigilance Directorates of their current shackles. It had toned down Sudhakaran’s wedding expenses by over 50 per cent of what the prosecution had cited.
Bail plea was not accepted, and is postponed for six more days”. This was the first case where a ruling chief minister had to step down on account of a court sentence. Her dream to become the chief minister of Tamil Nadu is now shattered with the verdict.
Despite attempting to avoid appearing personally before the court, citing security concerns, the Supreme Court ordered Jayalalithaa to do so. The Jayalalithaa case stands like a beacon to those in the Central Bureau of Investigation and in the vigilance machinery in the States who are investigating corrupt judbement servants encroaching on and buying up property under various names.
Following the judgment, Jayalalithaa was moved to Parappana Agrahara prison. He told reporters that he was being pressured by the state government and “forces” who wanted him off the case.
Another follower tried self-immolation in front of the house of Jayalalithaa at Poes Gardens but was stopped by the police. The Supreme Court verdict in jucgement disproportionate assets case should boost the morale of all those who are investigating corrupt public servants My mind goes back 21 years to when I was heading the Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption DVAC.
A source working closely with the Assehs prosecution said that if Sasikala is sworn in before the verdict, then Karnataka will tell the court that it was always her ambition to be in public service, and all her actions prior to that should be seen in that light. The Supreme Court methodically gave reasons why all four accused were guilty of criminal conspiracy.
SC verdict in Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case is a morale boost – The Hindu
This was the kind of propriety we displayed as the primary investigating agency. But from all accounts he stood up to enormous threats and intimidation. Will be displayed Will not be displayed Will be displayed. Inseveral prosecution witnesses resiled from their earlier depositions when Jayalalithaa was acquitted by Madras High Court.
Jayalalithaa illegal assets case returns to haunt Sasikala, Supreme Court verdict in a week
Sasikala has to surrender immediately for her remaining jail-term. The Court further pointed out a variety of circumstances in the case that proved the existence of a conspiracy among the accused.
Sasikala, Ilavarasi and Sudhakaran have to surrender before trial court forthwith. Unfortunately, several of this tribe in most of the States do not rise to the responsibility; their only qualification is their proximity to the ruling party.
It is public opinion that should assert itself now on. Special Court imposes a cost of one-day salary on SPP Bhavani Singh for not resuming final arguments citing ill-health. Also Read Sasikala convicted in DA case; can’t contest elections for 10 years.
Find this comment offensive? The leader of Dravida Munnetra KazhagamM. She was initially convicted for misusing her office during her tenure of — In fact, a few in the then establishment criticised me for being too law-bound and not sufficiently aggressive.
Verdict in Jayalalithaa’s DA case in a week? What it means for Sasikala’s bid as CM
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.